|
Federal Headlines
|
|
|
The Tax Court had jurisdiction over an individual's claim for tax overpayment after the regular three-year limitations period had expired. Although the IRS had conceded the fraud penalty, which justified the unlimited limitations period, and argued that the court lacked jurisdiction because the deficiency notice was issued after the limitations period had expired, it did not dispute the validity of the deficiency notice. Thus, the individual properly invoked the court's jurisdiction by timely filing a petition for redetermination of the deficiency. Because the Tax Court acquired jurisdiction to redetermine the deficiency, it also had jurisdiction to determine the amount of any overpayment of the same tax for the same taxable period under Code Sec. 6512(b). The IRS's subsequent concession of the fraud penalty, which barred the assessment for the tax year in question, did not cause the court to lose jurisdiction since its jurisdiction did not depend on the IRS's ability to assess a deficiency.
R.D. Fisher, TC Memo. 2008-256, Dec. 57,585(M)
Other References:
Code Sec. 6512
CCH Reference - 2008FED ¶39,100.393
Tax Research Consultant
CCH Reference - TRC LITIG: 6,126
|
State Headlines
|
|
|
The California Franchise Tax Board (FTB) has released additional information on the new requirement that personal income taxpayers with estimated tax or extension payments over $20,000, or with tax liabilities over $80,000, send payments electronically (e-pay). The mandatory e-pay requirement, enacted by A.B. 1389, Laws 2008, is based on estimated tax or extension payments made or tax returns filed for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2009. Once the mandatory e-pay threshold is met, a taxpayer is required to make that payment and subsequent payments electronically, regardless of the amount, type, or taxable year. Details of the legislation and an FTB Tax News article on the new requirement were previously reported. (TAXDAY, 2008/10/03, S.9, TAXDAY, 2008/11/05, S.7)
Fiduciaries, estates, and trusts are not required to make payments electronically, regardless of the amount owed.
As previously reported, the FTB will send a courtesy notice to taxpayers who meet the mandatory e-pay threshold and who pay using a nonelectronic method. Some tax preparation software may also remind taxpayers to e-pay. However, if any tax preparation software generates paper Form 540-ES vouchers when a taxpayer meets the mandatory e-pay threshold, the taxpayer must still pay electronically.
A penalty equal to 1% of the amount paid may be imposed for failure to comply with the new requirement, unless the failure to pay electronically is for reasonable cause and not willful neglect.
A taxpayer can obtain a waiver of the requirement if the FTB determines that the amounts paid in excess of the threshold amount were not representative of the taxpayer's tax liability. The FTB will review waiver requests and notify taxpayers in writing when it approves or denies such requests. The FTB previously announced that the waiver request form will be available on its Web site in March 2009. If the FTB grants a waiver and the taxpayer subsequently meets the mandatory e-pay requirement, the taxpayer must resume making payments using an electronic method.
Individuals who meet the e-pay criteria and file their own tax returns are not required to e-file their returns, but the FTB encourages those individuals to e-file. If an individual uses a tax preparer that files 100 or more tax returns, the FTB requires that tax preparer to file tax returns electronically.
Announcement, California Franchise Tax Board, November 14, 2008
|
|
| Copyright ©
2008, CCH
INCORPORATED. All rights reserved. |
|