December 26,  2007

Federal Headlines


Temporary and Proposed Regulations Provide Guidance on Allocating the Code Sec. 11(b)(1) Additional Tax and AMT Exemption Amount Among Controlled Group Members (T.D. 9369; NPRM REG-104713-07)

The IRS has issued temporary and proposed regulations providing guidance for calculating and apportioning the Code Sec. 11(b)(1) additional tax and the reduction in the alternative minimum tax (AMT) exemption amount among component members of controlled groups. The regulations also update and clarify the allocation of tax benefit items where a component member has a short tax year not including a December 31 date. The temporary rules further explain the concepts of a group's testing date and a member's testing period for purposes of determining which members and which tax years of those members are subject to the controlled group rules. The temporary regulations take effect on December 26, 2007.

Temporary Regulations

Two methods for apportioning the amount of additional tax under Code Sec. 11(b)(1) are provided under the temporary regulations --the proportionate method and the first-in-first-out (FIFO) method.

Under the proportionate method, the additional tax is allocated to any component member to which a tax bracket amount was apportioned in the same proportion as the portion of the tax benefit from the tax bracket that was allocated to that member bears to the total tax benefit amount provided to all members from the use of that tax bracket. The regulations set forth the steps for applying the method. Under the FIFO method, the first dollars of the additional tax are to be allocated proportionately to each member to which a tax bracket amount was apportioned, starting with the lowest tax bracket and continuing on successively to each next higher tax bracket until the entire amount of the additional tax has been fully apportioned among the members.

In addition, the temporary regulations provide guidance in calculating and apportioning the reduction in the AMT exemption amount. In particular, any reduction to the AMT exemption amount is apportioned to the component members in the same manner as the exemption amount. The current rules for allocating tax benefit items where a component member has a short tax year not including a December 31 date are also updated and clarified.

The temporary regulations further provide explanations of two concepts --a group's testing date and a member's testing period. A testing date is defined as the date that a controlled group is required to use in determining which of its members and which of their tax years will be subject to the controlled group rules. Generally, a group's testing date is the December 31 date included within all the members' tax years, whether such corporations are on a calendar or fiscal year. However, if a component member has a short tax year that does not include a December 31 date, then the last day of its short tax year serves as the member's testing date.

A testing period is the period of time that a controlled group member uses to determine its status as either a component member or an excluded member. The testing period begins on the first day of a member's tax year that ends on the day before its testing date. Thus, in the case of a member on a fiscal tax year, the portion of its tax year beginning after December 31 and ending on the last day of its tax year is not taken into account in determining its status as a component member or an excluded member.

Finally, the temporary regulations republish Temporary Reg. §1.1502-47T(s), which provides rules for life-nonlife consolidated groups to calculate their consolidated taxable income. This temporary regulation was inadvertently removed by T.D. 9342, I.R.B. 2007-35, 451, when other portions of Temporary Reg. §1.1502-47T were published as final regulations.

Proposed Regulations

The text of the temporary regulations also serves as the text of proposed regulations. Written or electronic comments and a request for public hearing must be received by March 25, 2008.

T.D. 9369, 2008FED ¶47,008

Proposed Regulations, NPRM REG-104713-07, 2008FED ¶49,780

Other References:

Code Sec. 1502

CCH Reference - 2007FED ¶33,193A

Code Sec. 1561

CCH Reference - 2007FED ¶33,341

CCH Reference - 2007FED ¶33,344

CCH Reference - 2007FED ¶33,344C

Code Sec. 1563

CCH Reference - 2007FED ¶33,361C

Tax Research Consultant

CCH Reference - TRC CCORP: 42,050

CCH Reference - TRC CCORP: 42,200

CCH Reference - TRC CCORP: 45,268

CCH Reference - TRC CONSOL: 7,106


Effective Date Relief Granted for Regulations on Transfers of Loss Shares of Subsidiary Stock (Notice 2008-9)

The IRS has provided effective date relief with respect to proposed regulations, issued in January 2007, that provide rules for consolidated group members on the transfer of a loss share of subsidiary stock (NPRM REG-157711-02, TAXDAY, 2007/01/17, I.3). The proposed effective date would have made the regulations applicable to all transfers on or after the date that the regulations are published as final regulations in the Federal Register. Comments received by practitioners regarding the proposed effective date, however, expressed concerns regarding a significant burden on taxpayers attempting to negotiate transactions prior to the publication of the final regulations.

Accordingly, while the regulations will generally apply to transfers on or after the date they are published as final regulations, they will not apply to a transfer to an unrelated party if the transfer is pursuant to an agreement that is binding prior to the date the regulations are published as final regulations and at all times thereafter. The IRS and Treasury Department anticipate that the rule will incorporate the provisions of Code Sec. 267(b) in determining whether parties are related for this purpose.

Notice 2008-9, 2008FED ¶46,217

Other References:

Code Sec. 267

CCH Reference - 2007FED ¶14,161.01

Code Sec. 337

CCH Reference - 2007FED ¶16,242.01

Code Sec. 358

CCH Reference - 2007FED ¶16,553.041

Code Sec. 597

CCH Reference - 2007FED ¶23,811.025

Code Sec. 1502

CCH Reference - 2007FED ¶33,168.0236

Tax Research Consultant

CCH Reference - TRC CCORP: 45,410

CCH Reference - TRC CCORP: 45,414


Transitional Relief Applies to Charitable Trusts that Cease to Qualify as Type III Supporting Organizations (Notice 2008-6)

The IRS has provided transitional relief and filing procedures for certain charitable trusts that fail the responsiveness test for Type III supporting organizations. These procedures apply to charitable trusts that do not qualify as supporting organizations under the significant voice test, but that did qualify as supporting organizations under the charitable trust test. The elimination of the charitable trust test for tax years beginning after August 16, 2007, may cause these trusts to be classified as private foundations.

A trust that becomes a private foundation during 2007 because of the elimination of the charitable trust test may continue to file Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax, for tax years beginning before January 1, 2008. The trust is not required to file an information return on Form 990-PF, Return of a Private Foundation or Section 4947(a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust ; or pay the Code Sec. 4940 excise tax on investment income, until its first tax year beginning after December 31, 2007. Normal due dates and submission rules apply to Form 990.

For its first tax year beginning after 2007, a trust that becomes a private foundation because of the elimination of the charitable trust test must file a paper Form 990-PF, and write "Notice 2008-6 status change" across the top. Otherwise, normal due dates and submission rules for Form 990-PF apply.

For tax years beginning after 2007, charitable trusts can continue to file Form 990 if they meet the significant voice test for Type III supporting organizations, or if they can establish that they meet the requirements for a Type I or Type II supporting organization. These trusts do not have to file Form 990-PF.

Notice 2008-6, 2008FED ¶46,219

Other References:

Code Sec. 509

CCH Reference - 2007FED ¶22,812.65

Tax Research Consultant

CCH Reference - TRC EXEMPT: 21,208.15


State Headlines


Kentucky --Corporate Income Tax: Order in Partnership Ownership Nexus Case Restated, Amended

A Kentucky circuit court has amended and restated its order that concluded an out-of-state corporation had sufficient nexus with Kentucky for corporation income tax purposes, but also concluded that an incorrect apportionment formula had been used in the assessment of the tax against the corporation (see TAXDAY, 2007/07/06, S.16). According to the court, it was incorrect to order remand of the case for determination of the amount of the corporation's refund after prevailing on the apportionment argument. The amount of the refund, applying the correct apportionment formula, was stipulated by the parties and, consequently, the corporation was entitled to immediate payment with interest.

The amended order also determined that it was appropriate to review U.S. Constitutional issues, specifically Commerce and Due Process Clause arguments, that were raised by the corporation and not addressed in the original order. Even though the corporation had no physical presence in Kentucky, the corporation's derivation of income from ownership interests in partnerships doing business within the state satisfied the substantial nexus requirement of the Commerce Clause. Therefore, the corporation was subject to corporation income tax on its distributive share of income.

The Due Process Clause requirement of a definite link or minimum connection was satisfied by the corporation's interest in partnerships doing business in Kentucky that resulted in a substantial amount of distributive income from in-state activities. In addition, the corporation had purposefully directed activities at Kentucky through the corporation's interest in the partnerships.

Kentucky Revenue Cabinet v. Swarth Corp., Franklin Circuit Court, Kentucky, No. 06-CI-00288, December 4, 2007, ¶202-810

Other References:

Explanations at ¶10-075

Explanations at ¶89-224


Ohio --Corporate Income Tax: Draft Rule Explains CAT Credits

The Ohio Department of Taxation has issued an information release that is a draft rule regarding credits for the commercial activity tax (CAT). Prior to adopting a rule to explain the different types of CAT credits, the Department is seeking public comment on the draft. Comments must be received by the end of the business day on January 11, 2008.

The Department explains that the rule is intended to identify the different credits available to taxpayers for CAT purposes and to explain the proper method for taxpayers to claim those credits against their CAT liability. For purposes of the CAT, the law provides for five different credits taxpayers may apply against their tax liability: (1) a nonrefundable jobs retention credit; (2) a nonrefundable credit for qualified research expenses; (3) a nonrefundable credit for a borrower's qualified research and development loan payments; (4) a credit for unused franchise tax net operating loss deductions; and (5) a refundable jobs creation credit.

The release is available on the Department's Web site at http://tax.ohio.gov/divisions/communications/information_releases/cat_2007_03.stm.

CAT Information Release 2007-03, Ohio Department of Taxation, December 21, 2007.


Washington --Property Tax: Relief Available for Property Owners Affected by Floods, Windstorms

The Washington Department of Revenue announced December 20 that property tax relief is available to the owners of property damaged or destroyed by recent flooding and windstorms. The Department indicates that property owners can apply to county assessors to reduce the taxable value of affected properties. Relief could include a partial refund of taxes paid in 2007 and a reduction of future taxes until the property is restored.

The Department's announcement and additional information may be found at http://dor.wa.gov/.

News Release, Washington Department of Revenue, December 20, 2007.


Copyright © 2007, CCH INCORPORATED. All rights reserved.